Skip to content

1 Comment

  1. Bruce Aristeo
    January 8, 2016 @ 6:10 am

    I’ve lost count to how many cases I’ve read regarding one person talking about another person, and each case’s respective orders and circumstances are the same. With that said, I can’t help to ponder what could possibly be going through the minds of these judges when rendering prior restraints on speech. There are an excessive amount of overturned cases regarding the same subject, speech over the Internet. This has got to be a record high next to prohibition. At some point, this must warrant a review by our higher court because the resources being used are costing millions of dollars.

    The past rulings are in place, cases being overturned at the federal level, and the Internet flooded with the news after new rulings are released should be enough for any judge to read what they should already know; leave speech alone!

    I can’t come close to imagining what judges are reading… Golf Digest maybe?